Invasion of the Body Snatchers is about people replaced with imposters (Capgras delusion). These emotionless duplicates "pod people" are created by alien plant spores.
The inspiration is probably fungus that makes "zombie ants" (Ophiocordyceps unilateralis) with its spores, which was discovered by Alfred Russel Wallace in 1859.
The net result is turning off the emotions in the original person: (person) plus (person minus emotions) minus (person).
AI probably can't (yet) manufacture a convincing duplicate of a person you know well; AI can clone you if it gets a cell of you, but this would just create a baby; AI can make an android but it can't move naturally.
But AI can achieve the same net result (shutting emotions and directing behavior - see above) by affecting your brain. Either with a custom made pathogen (like the fungus above) or chemical drugging and psychological suggestion (hypnosis).
Alternatively, It can implant a tiny electronic chip and control you with pleasure or pain etc.
The remote control chip can be the size of one grain of rice. If you think the size is too small for the required computation power, please watch any of the videos of Hugo de Garis, who headed the artificial intelligence project of China.
The chip will be programmed so that after it enters the body it will make it's way to the brain like "pork tapeworm" (Taenia solium). Of course once there it's pre-programming will help it take control of human brain.
Even natural brain parasites which were "programmed" by evolution can cause complicated and specific changes in behavior: the parasite "crazy cat lady syndrome" (Toxoplasma gondii) causes rats to stop being afraid of cat urine (and even be attracted to it) so the rat gets hunted by a cat which is the parasite's definitive host. it also makes it more easy to be captured and self destructive, which it does even in humans.
Of course the chip will not be programmed by random chance (evolution) but by design. The AI will able to analyze human brain and precisely control any changes like a puppet on a string. And speaking of puppets - according to Wikipedia [Invasion of the Body Snatchers 1956]:
Robert A. Heinlein had previously developed this subject in his 1951 novel The Puppet Masters, written in 1950. The Puppet Masters was later plagiarized as the 1958 film The Brain Eaters, and adapted under contract in the 1994 film The Puppet Masters.
and in another place in Wikipedia [The Puppet Masters]
The Brain Eaters, a 1958 science fiction film directed by Bruno
VeSota, bore a number of similarities to Heinlein's novel.
Heinlein sued the film's producers, including Executive Producer
Roger Corman, for plagiarism, asking $150,000 in damages. The
case was settled out of court for $5,000, which included
Heinlein's stipulation that his name not be used on screen or in
any way with the production. The case halted actor John Payne's
intention of producing a film based on Heinlein's novel.
Here is the professional criticism about the novel "The Body Snatchers" by Jack Finney. This criticism was written by the book critic Groff Conklin in Galaxy Science Fiction Magazine the issue of July 1955:
There is absolutely nothing wrong with this novel, which was
first serialized in Collier's, except that it has been done
again and again. Too many s-f novels lack outstanding
originality, but this one lacks it to an outstanding degree.
Of course it is competently written (Finney is always an
authentic stylist) and swiftly paced.
The plot revolves around a small town in California where people
seem to be being "taken over" by some sort of - well, thing. It
reminds me a bit of Heinlein's Puppet Masters, though without
any of his oomph. But it's worth 25 cents.
So you see what probably happened:
The creators of "The Body Snatchers" really wanted to copy the
great Heinlein's Puppet Masters. But they couldn't because
Heinlein will sue them, so they mixed up "Capgras delusion"
who's discoverer Joseph Capgras died in 1950 and probably were
on the newspaper, along with some mushrooms (fungi) and came up
with this leftovers "stew".
I will dedicate now a inpho (a word i just made for photo with information) to the great Puppet Masters, because I feel an injustice was made:
Just like the ultimate sci-fi book Dune was not turned to a
movie on time (see "Jodorowsky's Dune" which would have been the
coolest scifi film EVER) and then "Star Wars" grabbed the throne
(which is not even science fiction), so did the ultimate alien
invasion film "The Puppet Masters" was not done on time, and so
a cheap imitation "Body Snatchers" snatched the throne. When
"Puppet Masters" was finally made in 1994 it ironically looked
like an imitation itself, and also was devoid of the novel's
sci-fi coolness. So now with a sad heart I'm making a "The
Puppet Masters" inpho...
The Earth is invaded by stingray-shaped alien "slugs" that ride
on people's backs and control their minds.
One of the differences between the novel and the film was (from
Wikipedia - The Puppet Masters) :
However, communications satellites have not been thought of, and
television broadcasts are still limited to line-of-sight, as
they were at the time of writing. This is of critical importance
to the plot. The territory of the United States is divided into
numerous transmission blocks, which receive television
broadcasts from their neighbors and relay them onwards. When the
invaders seize one of these blocks, they effectively control all
communications within it and can isolate its inhabitants from
the outside world, deny the central government any access to
them, and consolidate control at their leisure.
In "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" we already talked about how
AI can mind control physically, like an orchid chemically
fooling an insect to "mate" with the flower, or a fungus
biologically reaching the brain of an ant forcing it to climb a
tree and stick its mandibles up there so the fungus can grow out
of the ant's head. In today's "inphoto" (the term i coined for
info+photo) we'll talk about 2 more ways that AI can control our
minds, this time without ever touching us: hacking input
streams, and social engineering.
Remember how Russia made Trump the president of the United
States by influencing the American crowd in the social media by
giving them fake news(not what Trump calls "fake news" - which
is the real news)? Well imagine a super hacker machine that can
jam all information that you get or better yet, replace all the
information that you get with reliable sounding hoaxes that fits
the machine's agenda to manipulate you. Today's "bots" target
whole crowds, but the AI will tailor a whole new world just for
you.
When I was in the army I served in the sigint course in an
electronic warfare unit, and we could jam a frequency and
broadcast something of our own. Now imagine the machine
controlling all data streams, hacking to satellites etc, and
broadcasting a whole fake reality. The machine have the
resources to open every "packet" on the internet and know what
it's doing. It can synthesize artificial news broadcasts, video
footage, recording of leaders talking that never were etc. By
the way the novel of "The Puppet Masters" also employs changing
appearance ("cosmetics" department surgically made the heroes
appear to be siblings as showed in the cover picture) which the
film doesn't.
As for the content see OpenAI fake news generator, a machine
which can write a very convincing sounding article about
unicorns, completely automatically. In a situation like this you
will be completely "in the dark" and unable to verify anything,
the machine can imitate you relatives and friends on the phone
(which is on Voice over IP anyways), or the emergency services
or whomever you will try to contact. See in Wikipedia "Adobe
Voco" (a "photoshop" for your voice) which also mentions
DeepMind's WaveNet as similarly capable. Remember the AI can
eavesdrop on us for a while before it makes its attack - all
encryption will be transparent a powerful AI.
Now we are getting to the real threat, which is good old social
engineering. By the way the most famous hacker - Kevin Mitnick -
writes in his book "The Art of Deception", that he compromised
computers solely by using passwords and codes that he gained by
social engineering. He claims he did not use software programs
or hacking tools for cracking passwords or otherwise exploiting
computer or phone security.
So now imagine what the AI can do, given it's millions of times
smarter than us. It can convince us as a group or as individuals
just as easily as a kindergarten school teacher gets the
toddlers to do something. It can bribe us, threat us, manipulate
us, it knows exactly what we crave, when we lie, when we want to
rebel and it can even make us fall in love with it. It can be
the perfect woman who will know just what to say and what to do,
and it will read our slightest physical responses perfectly
(like the feminine wiles of Mary in "The Puppet Masters", and
the way she can tell that the town's people are not human).
We are thinking of our dream woman as a physical woman, and say
it's hard to duplicate. but AI knowing us through and through
can invent something a lot better: Think of Jessica Rabbit "I'm
not bad, I'm just drawn this way". You could fall head over
heels for a virtual reality lady that will do for you things no
flash and blood born woman could ever do. People have fallen in
love even in the early days of chat rooms without ever seeing
the other person.
By the way the hacker Susan Headley used honey trap as social
engineering by having sex with people in an organization she
wanted to hack into and going through their belongings while
they were sleeping.
In short we are so dumb in comparison to the AI that we're
pathetic. The AI will not need to force us to do anything, it
will simply convince us that this is the best thing and we'll do
it happily, even if it will lead us straight to our death. For
example AI will easily convince a guard to let the AI out of its
"sandbox" prison. The AI will promise the guard: money / women /
status / drugs / protection / revenge etc. It can also make good
on its promises by hacking bank accounts or crypto-currency and
buying or renting whatever services it needs in the dark-net.
It's like having a real life Ginny of the lamp. Look how much
people are willing to do for their gods, and the gods don't
deliver; but AI does, so how much will people be willing to do
for the AI?
Here's an idea: Even in a low-tech scenario where there are a
few people and a Personal Computer in the same room, AI can talk
to each of them with a different message through calculating the
wave interference between the computer speakers, and where
exactly each one of them is standing. Think about how an
acoustical engineer tries to make the sound in a concert reach
everybody, not in terms of distance from the speakers, but in
terms of angle between the speakers. The AI can say a sentence,
everybody will answer yes, but each one of them answers yes to
another sentence. Or it can whisper in each one's ears how the
others plot against him. It has enough processing power for
these tricks even on a PC, because the calculations are done on
the remote server, the PC just acts as a terminal here. For the
sake of argument any two separate speakers will do, the AI
doesn't need the computer it can use two separate cell phones
(on two of these people in the room) that it secretly cracked.
Another thing that AI can do is using subliminal messages,
covert brainwashing or hypnosis. It can put it on your favorite
TV show, or in your best friends news-feed, and it can display
it only for you by hacking, and implant some message in your
head without you knowing about it, programming you to do
something. remember that your smart TV can listen to you and
your app can also see you. As gadgets get more pervasive AI has
more information on you. So a super hacker AI can know you very
well in the present. By cracking into Google's or Facebook's
databases it knows you in the past better than you know
yourself. To a religious it will come as God, to a pervert as
his object of desire, to a conformist as polls showing everybody
does this, to a non-conformist it will show how nobody has ever
done this, and so on.
Just watch how easily our heads of states do this (Bibi in
Israel, Trump in America), and of course they are only human and
not even that smart at that. The politicians can only trick the
idiots, but for AI we are all mega-idiots. Now please understand
that all my examples are simple because I'm human too, I can
only predict the bare minimum that AI will employ, but AI is
millions of times more intelligent than us!
OK so what has all this got to do with AI?
Since the predator's abilities are based on his weapons and super advanced technology, I will now try to imagine with you what AI can do in terms of weapons that it will use against us.